While I previously ignored Alex Jones, my 'spidey' senses went on alert when the Sandy Hook families sued him. It made no sense. There was no true monetary injury for defamation. This was the standard case of unsympathetic individual testing the limits of the First Amendment. It became obvious the First Amendment lost. As horrific as the massacre was, questions regarding it were legitimate. I went from thinking Alex was fringe to him being someone to consider. The case against him was grotesque lawfare.
All Alex Jones did was ask questions similar to Richard D Hall asking questions about the Manchester bombing in the UK and also being hauled into court by the families concerned. It seems that asking questions and drawing your own conclusions is now illegal in the West even though NATO is on the record as admitting to setting up false flags in the past where they murdered innocents for political gain and we are now finding out that NATO was behind the Covid scam based on the recent whistleblower revelations in the German parliament.
The North Atlantic Terrorist Organisation was very well named.
It is pretty obvious that Infowars always get people used to horrific ideas a decade or so before they come to pass so they are essentially smoothing the way to bring in these horrific ideas. I have always considered Jones to be a plant, much like Trump, ever since he got that footage of the goings on at Bohemian Grove. The idea that he could just wander in there and film and wander out again was always utterly preposterous.
Agreed. While I am enjoying the current goings-on, I wonder if the rescue by Elon simply foreshadows the next part of the script-- the planned revelation of multiple hoaxes, including several famous events that rhyme with bandy nook, kuvalde, mosston marathon bombing, and dine eleven.
While I previously ignored Alex Jones, my 'spidey' senses went on alert when the Sandy Hook families sued him. It made no sense. There was no true monetary injury for defamation. This was the standard case of unsympathetic individual testing the limits of the First Amendment. It became obvious the First Amendment lost. As horrific as the massacre was, questions regarding it were legitimate. I went from thinking Alex was fringe to him being someone to consider. The case against him was grotesque lawfare.
All Alex Jones did was ask questions similar to Richard D Hall asking questions about the Manchester bombing in the UK and also being hauled into court by the families concerned. It seems that asking questions and drawing your own conclusions is now illegal in the West even though NATO is on the record as admitting to setting up false flags in the past where they murdered innocents for political gain and we are now finding out that NATO was behind the Covid scam based on the recent whistleblower revelations in the German parliament.
The North Atlantic Terrorist Organisation was very well named.
Thanks for the update, the plot thickens!
I’m not so sure infowars isn’t just an elaborate “operation mockingbird asset”…love to know what other readers think
It is pretty obvious that Infowars always get people used to horrific ideas a decade or so before they come to pass so they are essentially smoothing the way to bring in these horrific ideas. I have always considered Jones to be a plant, much like Trump, ever since he got that footage of the goings on at Bohemian Grove. The idea that he could just wander in there and film and wander out again was always utterly preposterous.
Agreed. While I am enjoying the current goings-on, I wonder if the rescue by Elon simply foreshadows the next part of the script-- the planned revelation of multiple hoaxes, including several famous events that rhyme with bandy nook, kuvalde, mosston marathon bombing, and dine eleven.