I've seen teenage runaway minimum-wage workers at McDonald's with twelve nose rings and tribal face tattoos perform better at their jobs than admitted diversity hire Karine Jean-Pierre. Related: KJP vs. English: White House Diversity Hire’s Reading Problem
This Vogue cover treatment is putting lipstick on a pig.
It's noticeable to those who have eyes that the most beautiful woman on the political scene in the last decade wasn't featured in any magazine because she's married to orange man. If she were married to dead-brain Joe, she would have been the new/improved Jackie.
I just got a renewal offer in the mail for Vogue for $10 a year. It is not worth 10 cents a year. After the George Floyd and BLM stuff happened, all the fashion magazines became exclusively minority in their articles, models, advertising. So we long-time subscribers all cancelled. By inserting politics into what had been enjoyable fashion, travel, and even new book reviews, they destroyed their product. Very very sad. And now I read that KJP has broken up with her significant other.
She was handpicked explicitly to distract people from what's really going on. As long as people think this is a problem, or issue, they'll never look at the real problems going on in the real world. The US government is always gearing up for more war including poisoning, or infecting as many people as possible while working those who still can work to death for slave's wages preferably just as soon as they've lost anything and everything of any real value.
"But her total incompetence, of course, didn't stop Vogue from going full-service on her taint, reaching that tongue deep into the recesses of her moist anus like only a lover can while tenderly massaging her brave and stunning clitoris in circular fashion."
I dislike KJP -- a lot -- but I feel using a woman's anatomy against her, as if there is something disgusting about it, is a low blow. And hypocritical since most guys would happily wrap ourselves in said anatomy.
There are plenty of pertinent attacks one could use against her. A generic attack like this seems an atttack against all women. I don't know about you, but I worship some women and reading this filth makes me feel dirty and disloyal.
Ben, it isn't cool or pertinent to treat a women in such an overblown sexual way. What does it have to do with anything? We don't have to live down to the crap the MSM prints about us.
This Vogue cover treatment is putting lipstick on a pig.
It's noticeable to those who have eyes that the most beautiful woman on the political scene in the last decade wasn't featured in any magazine because she's married to orange man. If she were married to dead-brain Joe, she would have been the new/improved Jackie.
I just got a renewal offer in the mail for Vogue for $10 a year. It is not worth 10 cents a year. After the George Floyd and BLM stuff happened, all the fashion magazines became exclusively minority in their articles, models, advertising. So we long-time subscribers all cancelled. By inserting politics into what had been enjoyable fashion, travel, and even new book reviews, they destroyed their product. Very very sad. And now I read that KJP has broken up with her significant other.
Who knew a fawning interview in Vogue could actually a form of soft core porn? WOW getting right to the heart of the matter, no fooling you. BRAVO
Spot-on post, but my taste buds are in recovery 🤪
I’m in BK too, just did that very thing last night. 💕🍩
I'm not asking for an apology. I am only reflecting that it seemed over over the top.
She was handpicked explicitly to distract people from what's really going on. As long as people think this is a problem, or issue, they'll never look at the real problems going on in the real world. The US government is always gearing up for more war including poisoning, or infecting as many people as possible while working those who still can work to death for slave's wages preferably just as soon as they've lost anything and everything of any real value.
I was refering to:
"But her total incompetence, of course, didn't stop Vogue from going full-service on her taint, reaching that tongue deep into the recesses of her moist anus like only a lover can while tenderly massaging her brave and stunning clitoris in circular fashion."
I dislike KJP -- a lot -- but I feel using a woman's anatomy against her, as if there is something disgusting about it, is a low blow. And hypocritical since most guys would happily wrap ourselves in said anatomy.
There are plenty of pertinent attacks one could use against her. A generic attack like this seems an atttack against all women. I don't know about you, but I worship some women and reading this filth makes me feel dirty and disloyal.
Ben, you don't walk that softly but I never caught this side of you before.
Ben, it isn't cool or pertinent to treat a women in such an overblown sexual way. What does it have to do with anything? We don't have to live down to the crap the MSM prints about us.