She should have known that being Asian ranked her lower on the Maslow's Hierarchy of Oppression pyramid than her African American colleagues. As an Asian woman she can play the oppressed card with people below her on the pyramid like white men, but never people above her like black trans women lesbians, for example. Rookie error! 😅
This is hilarious. I noticed a while ago that young Asians, especially the women, were more woke than anyone. And considering their penchant for mastering difficult enterprises (such as a recent baroque recital composed almost exclusively of those of Asian heritage joyfully playing the music) of course they will outdo anyone on the subject. I call it the Nietzesque complex fueled by religiosity. If you play in Hegel's world, you will be disposed of later to advance the cause.
And it is part of the operating system that comes from the Hegelian trap. If you build your system in which you need perpetual revolutions to advance the cause, you will always need new scapegoats to be the oppressors.
Was the ACLU ever a genuine defender of free speech? Or was championing free speech merely a useful tactic when authoritarian leftists were the underdog, to be discarded as soon as they got real power?
The ACLU hasn’t been a legitimate defender of liberty and free speech for decades.
She should have known that being Asian ranked her lower on the Maslow's Hierarchy of Oppression pyramid than her African American colleagues. As an Asian woman she can play the oppressed card with people below her on the pyramid like white men, but never people above her like black trans women lesbians, for example. Rookie error! 😅
This is hilarious. I noticed a while ago that young Asians, especially the women, were more woke than anyone. And considering their penchant for mastering difficult enterprises (such as a recent baroque recital composed almost exclusively of those of Asian heritage joyfully playing the music) of course they will outdo anyone on the subject. I call it the Nietzesque complex fueled by religiosity. If you play in Hegel's world, you will be disposed of later to advance the cause.
and if they ever "win", people like that one will be the first sacrificed/lines up against the wall.
they are too dangerous to be let run loose.
And it is part of the operating system that comes from the Hegelian trap. If you build your system in which you need perpetual revolutions to advance the cause, you will always need new scapegoats to be the oppressors.
Was the ACLU ever a genuine defender of free speech? Or was championing free speech merely a useful tactic when authoritarian leftists were the underdog, to be discarded as soon as they got real power?
Ha!
the feckless f**ks at the aclu leapt into the abyss a long time.
they are now the opposite of what they were.