16 Comments

You know, I just KNEW when they came out with this "hate speech" bullshit way back when, that they were going to use it for censorship. I recall saying to my husband, "Yeah, but just WHO gets to decide what is 'hate speech?'" People hate. Some more than others. It's how humanity is wired for the most part. And I reserve the right to hate whomever and whatever I feel like hating at the time. GFY if you don't like it.

I don't give a crap about the "Royal Family". Never have, never will. Parasites. If they all drop dead, I still won't care. It will be a minor blip in my day. How they think they're better than me, I do not know. If I was done with my preps, I'd say bring on that killlshot CME. We'll see who has actual skills and who doesn't.

Expand full comment

Whenever I see the word "hate" tossed around in the media or social media, I know censorship is on the menu....

Expand full comment

... once upon a time, it was the great CIA flying car psy-op! Whensoever the US economy was afflicted a major financial meltdown (crash of 1987; panic of 2008), SURPRISE! Mainstream media flooded airwaves and newsprint, with reports of flying cars (e.g., runaway Audis, circa 1987; runaway Toyotas, 2008). Circa Edward Snowdon, April of 2013, one of the firms surreptitiously employed by the department of Justice to monitor commenting on social media, it would be small, over-specialized firms like Bluecoat Systems, crawling sites like these to ferret out and expose certain commenters. It would not be a far fetched notion to envision, creepy-overpaid keyboard analysts, cooking up a princess cancer crisis, for the express purpose of further expanding depth, breadth and extent of commenting cohorts previously segmented. The hot topic as of this writing, commenting on CIA involvement in the Moscow massacre. CIA people are eager to see exactly who's connecting the dots, who isn't, Crimea bridge blast, deep see natural gas pipeline explosions, Moscow's American style wild-wild west shoot 'um up at the Ruskie mall! Smart money's wagered on, in the spirit of the great CIA flying car psy-op, the likelihood the great Princess cancer crisis is just another cleverly conceived red herring - Samuel.

Expand full comment

Read some of your earlier posts, about how you escaped the jaws of nihilist reductionism or whatever it was had you in its clutches. You just wandered back there.

No-one cares. About Kate or the story. Take a week off reading the news online. Stop youtubing. Tune out. Cut the cable. Smell the roses or whatever flowers have perfume wherever you are. Get angry about something important, or don’t get angry at all.

Expand full comment

It doesn't get more important than The Crown.

They are the Deep State.

Expand full comment

FFS. Anyone can trot out nonsense like that. The Deep State is deep because it is hidden. Monarchies die without visibility. Chas is unloved. Liz was loved. Kate is a commoner in a country with a bicameral parliament in which the power resides in the House of Commons and it is a constitutional monarchy - the Monarch’s balls are in a glass jar by the Speaker’s chair. Zero power other than illusion, loyalty, magic and respect. Like Not all that glisters is gold and some distance maintains the illusion. For how long? No idea. Don’t care. The better analogy for the Deep State is Japan’s bakufu which ran things for the heriditary Shogunate, in the name of the powerless but divine Emperor until 1860. Back to Ben’s Brain Fart: last I read he was exiled to Thailand with his hot not-American wife. Quoting the Telegraph is a giveaway: Americans in America do not read the Torygraph. It does not speak to Americans. It speaks to Englishmen, at home and abroad.

News is about selling ads wrapped in a set of values to which a segment of the populace cleaves. Ben’s rant was fodder for Morning Star if it remains extant. The Torygraph, like the Tories and the GOP, went firmly left around 30 years ago, although its readers remain to the right. But the papers know that Royal stories sell more papers and clicks than any other issue. British papers are unlike the stultifying-prose riddled dross of America’s “free press”. The British papers change their tunes according to what outrages or excites the reader. By arse licking royalty, they get access.

Kate would have, like (Sir) Mick Jagger and everyone (Clapton and a few others excepted) “done her duty” and got jabbed. Like Chas. They all have to do what their duty requires. It is inculcated.

So now they and millions of others are damaged from the “safe and effective” injections. Bioengineered by the Deep State, which is largely uninjected.

She ain’t Deep State. The Windsors are not Deep State.

Rothschilds, Kagans, Blinkens, etc: these are Deep State aristocracy. 5 Eyes, CIA, DNC, GOP, FBI, Disney, Murdochs, TV corporations, The Fed, the UN, WHO, EU - these are the visible elements of the deep state.

Expand full comment

You are just clueless. You can't actually disprove reality with psuedo intellectual bullshit no matter how hard you condescend.

Ukraine right now is one example of many, but you want it to be some super duper mystery, which it is not, been hiding in plain sight for a thousand years and there is no equal.

The Sun never sets on the evil that is Thr Crown and your Scooby Doo Fantasy doesn't change that fact.

Expand full comment

How did the Lady Princess become sacred?

Expand full comment

certainly not by sacred democratic means

Expand full comment

I took the word and premise from you, since I'm not invested in the Royal family.

Expand full comment

We hate hate more than we hate the hating Haters. They hate to admit their hate is superior to the hate of the lesser haters because they see their hate as an art. But we HATE their art. They simply love to hate as much, or more, than they hate to love.

The Elite professionals of Hate, Inc. say that Hate is Love and Love is Hate, War is Peace and truth is a lie, and that mostly peaceful murder and rape is justice. And we (not "they") are destroying a piece of cosmological rock and so WE must be culled, but that it needs them to save it. Birthing men can shat one out their cloaca but it's not theirs - it's theirs'.

40% say that everything is just peachy. Well, I hate to say it....

Expand full comment

In a much better world, Kate would simply come clean about her medical condition something like, "Like all too many of us, I am battling cancer with my chin up and faith in a power much greater than any of us. And while I am no fan of idle gossip, I do not want my personal misfortune to be the occasion of a far greater misfortune to our dear country, that of censorship." Like I said, in a much better world.

Expand full comment

Never let a good crisis go to waste.

Expand full comment

Back before there was ever any media there were never any conspiracy theories or for that matter any conspiracies at the royal court.......right? The Windsors and their predecessors were all squeaky clean , the absolute pinnacle of morality....right? So we are supposed to believe that all theat is now a thing of the past old bean? Where is MY privacy?

Expand full comment

What I heard was royal infidelity of the most common sort, fraternizing with Noble's wives, by William.

People wondered if her absence was related, and the Defenders of the Crown were outraged, even though such is an ancient tradition.

Whether it relates or not, it's plenty plausible.

Expand full comment

I'm more angry than I should be.

Up until December, 2023, the MSM published pics and info. on the Princess just about every day.

Some time after Christmas the Princess seemed to have been cancelled. We were told about an op. but barely any info. What has once been a source of gushing news dried up. Even on her birthday, there was no official pic or news (which is the protocol).

I like to think the public have little confidence in the authorities. The authorities which are stuffled with propagandists, P.R. specialists, stylists, advisors etc. Yet no one made any statement so the public continued to inquire.

I believe the silence was a deliberate provocation to arouse those members of the public who did care and were suspicious.

When official pics and info were eventually provided, they proved to be false. Instead of the culprits being named and shamed, the Princess and then the public were blamed. In other words, the victims are blamed. And the guilty ones slither away.

Of course, it's for censorship purposes. Meanwhile, the Princess has been exploited or worse.

Expand full comment