16 Comments

You know, I just KNEW when they came out with this "hate speech" bullshit way back when, that they were going to use it for censorship. I recall saying to my husband, "Yeah, but just WHO gets to decide what is 'hate speech?'" People hate. Some more than others. It's how humanity is wired for the most part. And I reserve the right to hate whomever and whatever I feel like hating at the time. GFY if you don't like it.

I don't give a crap about the "Royal Family". Never have, never will. Parasites. If they all drop dead, I still won't care. It will be a minor blip in my day. How they think they're better than me, I do not know. If I was done with my preps, I'd say bring on that killlshot CME. We'll see who has actual skills and who doesn't.

Expand full comment

Whenever I see the word "hate" tossed around in the media or social media, I know censorship is on the menu....

Expand full comment

... once upon a time, it was the great CIA flying car psy-op! Whensoever the US economy was afflicted a major financial meltdown (crash of 1987; panic of 2008), SURPRISE! Mainstream media flooded airwaves and newsprint, with reports of flying cars (e.g., runaway Audis, circa 1987; runaway Toyotas, 2008). Circa Edward Snowdon, April of 2013, one of the firms surreptitiously employed by the department of Justice to monitor commenting on social media, it would be small, over-specialized firms like Bluecoat Systems, crawling sites like these to ferret out and expose certain commenters. It would not be a far fetched notion to envision, creepy-overpaid keyboard analysts, cooking up a princess cancer crisis, for the express purpose of further expanding depth, breadth and extent of commenting cohorts previously segmented. The hot topic as of this writing, commenting on CIA involvement in the Moscow massacre. CIA people are eager to see exactly who's connecting the dots, who isn't, Crimea bridge blast, deep see natural gas pipeline explosions, Moscow's American style wild-wild west shoot 'um up at the Ruskie mall! Smart money's wagered on, in the spirit of the great CIA flying car psy-op, the likelihood the great Princess cancer crisis is just another cleverly conceived red herring - Samuel.

Expand full comment

Read some of your earlier posts, about how you escaped the jaws of nihilist reductionism or whatever it was had you in its clutches. You just wandered back there.

No-one cares. About Kate or the story. Take a week off reading the news online. Stop youtubing. Tune out. Cut the cable. Smell the roses or whatever flowers have perfume wherever you are. Get angry about something important, or don’t get angry at all.

Expand full comment

How did the Lady Princess become sacred?

Expand full comment

We hate hate more than we hate the hating Haters. They hate to admit their hate is superior to the hate of the lesser haters because they see their hate as an art. But we HATE their art. They simply love to hate as much, or more, than they hate to love.

The Elite professionals of Hate, Inc. say that Hate is Love and Love is Hate, War is Peace and truth is a lie, and that mostly peaceful murder and rape is justice. And we (not "they") are destroying a piece of cosmological rock and so WE must be culled, but that it needs them to save it. Birthing men can shat one out their cloaca but it's not theirs - it's theirs'.

40% say that everything is just peachy. Well, I hate to say it....

Expand full comment

In a much better world, Kate would simply come clean about her medical condition something like, "Like all too many of us, I am battling cancer with my chin up and faith in a power much greater than any of us. And while I am no fan of idle gossip, I do not want my personal misfortune to be the occasion of a far greater misfortune to our dear country, that of censorship." Like I said, in a much better world.

Expand full comment

Never let a good crisis go to waste.

Expand full comment

Back before there was ever any media there were never any conspiracy theories or for that matter any conspiracies at the royal court.......right? The Windsors and their predecessors were all squeaky clean , the absolute pinnacle of morality....right? So we are supposed to believe that all theat is now a thing of the past old bean? Where is MY privacy?

Expand full comment

What I heard was royal infidelity of the most common sort, fraternizing with Noble's wives, by William.

People wondered if her absence was related, and the Defenders of the Crown were outraged, even though such is an ancient tradition.

Whether it relates or not, it's plenty plausible.

Expand full comment

I'm more angry than I should be.

Up until December, 2023, the MSM published pics and info. on the Princess just about every day.

Some time after Christmas the Princess seemed to have been cancelled. We were told about an op. but barely any info. What has once been a source of gushing news dried up. Even on her birthday, there was no official pic or news (which is the protocol).

I like to think the public have little confidence in the authorities. The authorities which are stuffled with propagandists, P.R. specialists, stylists, advisors etc. Yet no one made any statement so the public continued to inquire.

I believe the silence was a deliberate provocation to arouse those members of the public who did care and were suspicious.

When official pics and info were eventually provided, they proved to be false. Instead of the culprits being named and shamed, the Princess and then the public were blamed. In other words, the victims are blamed. And the guilty ones slither away.

Of course, it's for censorship purposes. Meanwhile, the Princess has been exploited or worse.

Expand full comment