Originally published via The Daily Bell:
The latest updates on the “new normal” – chronicling the lies, distortions, and abuses by the ruling class.
The “public health” house of cards vis-à-vis COVID has collapsed at freefall speed in the last month or so. Even the governments of deep-blue states have tossed out forced school masking — the crown jewel of arbitrary and cruel social control measures.
Taking advantage of the fact that humans are forward-looking, resilient organisms, the social engineers count on us getting up, licking our wounds, limping along, and letting the guilty escape justice.
Barack Obama used the same strategy when, upon taking office, he refused to prosecute any of the Wall Street bankers responsible for nuking the US economy and then holding the treasury hostage at gunpoint to demand a bailout — despite campaign promises to legally pursue them.
(In fact, to add insult to injury, Obama then spit in the eye of the marks he duped into voting for him by appointing Timothy Geithner, the bankers’ favorite pet. to the position of Treasury Secretary. Geithner previously served as the New York Fed president during the meltdown, and Obama nominated him as a reward for his loyalty to the Wall St. interests that funded his campaign.)
<image redacted>
“Move along, nothing to see here.”
But we can’t forgive and forget the COVID overlords’ crimes go for fundamental reasons:
·Justice demands that we hold the criminals accountable for the literally incaculable, vast physical and psychological damage they’ve done to the civilian victims of their war crimes.
·We have to set the precedent that similar future crimes will be met with harsh punishment –- or better yet, ensure they are never attempted in the first place. In criminology this is called deterrence theory:
“Deterrence is the theory that criminal penalties do not just punish violators, but also discourage other people from committing similar offenses. Many people point to the need to deter criminal actions after a high-profile incident in which an offender is seen to have received a light sentence.”
·Continued survival requires that we reject the budding biomedical technocracy (which COVID restrictions were a Trojan horse for) and restore the foundational Enlightenment principles of bodily autonomy and privacy protections – as espoused in the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution, among other landmark legal documents in the Western legal tradition.
Given the fact that technological “progress” has made maintaining Constitutional civil liberties protections an uphill fight, medical-technocratic tyranny might become the rule in the rest of the world in the coming decade. But if it has a chance of being successfully defeated anywhere, that place is the West (although things admittedly haven’t been going super great on that front in much of the West, particularly Australia, Canada, and many Western European states.)
Without effective restraints, the social engineers will not stop innovating creative new ways to insert their biotech into our bodies. The particular virus or other “public health” threat used as the excuse will evolve over time – it might be COVID today, but tomorrow it will be weaponized smallpox or some other emerging pathogen.·Perhaps above all, our children are watching. Future generations will look back – both in moral judgment and for guidance — on how we treated the criminals who perpetrated the lockdowns and vaccine mandates once their enormous social and economic costs became clear. People and the systems that they operate, for better or worse, tend to operate largely on precedent. Past events inform how future events unfold.
We can’t normalize the forced drugging of an entire population at economic gunpoint. We cannot abide government or corporate (increasingly one and the same entity) mandates to submit to an experimental gene therapy just to find meaningful employment or even to buy food at a grocery store – all while the government and corporate media covers up its side effects in an unprecedented censorship campaign, and all to “protect” from a virus with a 99+% survival rate.
Posterity’s generations, again, will rightly judge us for how we respond to these assaults on human dignity here and now, before they become acceptable precedent.
———————————–
The last point, arguably, is the most salient as well as the most morally compelling.
Above all, we can’t forgive what they’ve done to the most vulnerable among us: the kids.
Every single public health official responsible for (often permanently) damaging children’s mental and physical well-being with experimental mRNA gene therapy mandates, cruel forced masking in schools, social isolation, and propaganda — down to the county level — deserves the full weight of the legal system pressed on their neck.
Let’s briefly survey the damage they have done to children’s health, how they’ve undermined the right of parents to make medical determinations, and how they’ve transformed the institutions intended to nurture children’s development into virtual reeducation camps.
And then ask yourself – what moral obscenity would we commit to just let this go and move on? Especially in light of the extensively documented near-zero health risk that the virus poses to children.
Canadian Adult Vaxx Enthusiasts Secretly Ferrying Children to Vaxx Sites
Via RT:
<image redacted>
Jenn Psaki cheerleads forcing kids to eat lunch outside in the middle of winter cold for ‘the Science©’
<image redacted>
Just at the moment the reporter mentions children forced to eat outside, infamous Swamp creature Jen Psaki can’t contain her pleasure.
Dr. Peter McCollough: Sanjay Gupta via Sesame Street ‘seduced children into getting the vaccine’
Pfizer tests third vaccine dose in children under five, says two doses are not strong enough
Via Sky News:
<image redacted>
UK Vaccine Advisers: Risks of COVID Shots for Children Outweigh Benefits, Child Vaxxing Not Recommended
Via Reuters:
“Britain’s vaccine advisers said they were not recommending the vaccination of all 12- to 15-year-olds against COVID-19… the JCVI said it wanted more information on the long-term effects of rare reports of heart inflammation, known as myocarditis, in young people following vaccination with Pfizer’s shot.”
UK ‘Vaccine Minister’: We’re Vaxxing the Children Anyway, Parental Consent For Medical Treatment Now Irrelevant
Via the Guardian:
“Healthy 12- to 15-year-olds could override their parents’ decision on vaccination in the right circumstances, a minister has said, as the UK government prepares to overrule advice and extend jabs to younger teens.”
What happened to respecting “the Science©”?
Pennsylvania Teacher Tapes Mask to Students Face
Via New York Post:
<image redacted>
Warlord Fauci: Inject toddlers with 3 shots
COVID Lockdowns Lowered Children’s IQ
COVID lockdowns wrecked children’s development:
“In the decade preceding the pandemic, the mean IQ score on standardised tests for children aged between three months and three years of age hovered around 100, but for children born during the pandemic that number tumbled to 78.”
Speech therapist: clinic has seen ‘364% increase in patient referrals of babies and toddlers’
Unvaxxed parents in Western Australia barred from visiting hospitalized children
Ben Bartee is a Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs. Follow his stuff via his blog, Armageddon Prose, Substack, Patreon, Gab, and Twitter.
Bitcoin public address: 14gU3aHBXkNq8bDqmibfnubV7kSJqfx5LX
“Healthy 12- to 15-year-olds could override their parents’ decision on vaccination"
No they can't. If a parent decides the child should be vaccinated the child can not refuse. Children are not allowed to override their government's decision on vaccination.