I think my comment will go straight to the circular file but at least I will have a record of my objection. I certainly don't trust the little government workers or their pet robots to accurately record information from those they swore to serve.
Thank you for the reminder and the link making it easy to submit my opposition to adding Covid-19 vaccine to the childhood schedule of immunizations.
My husband and I and all of our children and grandchildren are pure bloods but I have a responsibility to make it more difficult for the bureaucrats to 'accidentally vaccinate' the grandkids who attend public school.
I too thought the Pfizer exec admitting that at EU parliament with a chuckle would be the 'smoking gun' to snap the dissonant ones back to reality. I shared it with an injected friend and the reply was strange. He said I shouldn't worry about it and that the whole thing has been mismanaged and that I shouldn't let it get to me....I said I was more worried about him and friends who've been injected and that he must be angry, surely. He said he was angry but that no criminal trials will happen and that he no longer reads the news, just tries to focus on positive things that he can influence.
Basically, defeatism and nonchalant passivity, block out the noise and try to move on and forget about it all.
We shouldn't give up and we should keep sharing the revelations and attempting to reach those affected both physically and mentally. Yet I believe it is still thus far, a mostly peaceful and accepting democide for the majority.
This isn't news or a bombshell. It has been know for a very long time that Pfizer never tested whether or not their "vaccine" stopped transmission. Pfizer never hid this fact.
Yeah but their better-trained executives never slipped up and just said it out loud in plain English. The other liars presented to regulatory committees were more clever than this lady.
When an MD says something it is misinformation, but if a Pfizer executive says the exact same thing, they are an expert, so it is true and becomes news.
What bothers me is that she didn’t answer the question that she was asked- did Pfizer test for transmission prior to market launch? She answered, “Regarding the question around, um, did we know about stopping the immunisation [sic] before it entered the market? No, heh.”
The MP wanted to know about transmission and she used the term “immunization.” She didn’t accidentally use the wrong word, she intentionally skirted the question. She was prepped by Pfizer’s in-house counsel before the hearing, rehearing the scripted answers over and over. Her job was to give non-answers with just enough credibility to satisfy the MPs and keep them from calling Bourla, again.
Yeah I noticed that but didn't comment on it. I don't think that part of the dodge was intentional; I think she's probably just scientifically illiterate.
It is difficult to differentiate incompetence from malfeasance. They look an awful lot alike. I do think she tried very hard to not answer the question.
You are 100% correct; this is an exhausting and demoralizing subject but I agree with Mr. Creed; abandoning hope is premature.
“In every battle there comes a time when both sides consider themselves beaten. Then he who continues the attack wins.” ― Ulysses S. Grant
They're trying to mandate the clot-shot for kids to attend schools.
The CDC will be taking comments on this for two more days, show them some love
https://www.regulations.gov/document/CDC-2022-0111-0001
I think my comment will go straight to the circular file but at least I will have a record of my objection. I certainly don't trust the little government workers or their pet robots to accurately record information from those they swore to serve.
Trust me, if you and a few hundred thousand other pissed off grannies express their opinion they'll take notice.
Oh, they'll notices all the incoming pucks and realize they need to get a bigger goalie.
Thank you for the reminder and the link making it easy to submit my opposition to adding Covid-19 vaccine to the childhood schedule of immunizations.
My husband and I and all of our children and grandchildren are pure bloods but I have a responsibility to make it more difficult for the bureaucrats to 'accidentally vaccinate' the grandkids who attend public school.
I too thought the Pfizer exec admitting that at EU parliament with a chuckle would be the 'smoking gun' to snap the dissonant ones back to reality. I shared it with an injected friend and the reply was strange. He said I shouldn't worry about it and that the whole thing has been mismanaged and that I shouldn't let it get to me....I said I was more worried about him and friends who've been injected and that he must be angry, surely. He said he was angry but that no criminal trials will happen and that he no longer reads the news, just tries to focus on positive things that he can influence.
Basically, defeatism and nonchalant passivity, block out the noise and try to move on and forget about it all.
We shouldn't give up and we should keep sharing the revelations and attempting to reach those affected both physically and mentally. Yet I believe it is still thus far, a mostly peaceful and accepting democide for the majority.
"Woozily..Oogy.."? Rachael Maddow is the perfect narcissistic freak for dissemination of this nonsense.
Anything less than the heads on a plate of each one of these "people" that you cited is too little.
This isn't news or a bombshell. It has been know for a very long time that Pfizer never tested whether or not their "vaccine" stopped transmission. Pfizer never hid this fact.
Yeah but their better-trained executives never slipped up and just said it out loud in plain English. The other liars presented to regulatory committees were more clever than this lady.
When an MD says something it is misinformation, but if a Pfizer executive says the exact same thing, they are an expert, so it is true and becomes news.
Not at all a bombshell.
Admitted by Pfizer and widely known by Fall 2020.
Then suppressed ever since.
What bothers me is that she didn’t answer the question that she was asked- did Pfizer test for transmission prior to market launch? She answered, “Regarding the question around, um, did we know about stopping the immunisation [sic] before it entered the market? No, heh.”
The MP wanted to know about transmission and she used the term “immunization.” She didn’t accidentally use the wrong word, she intentionally skirted the question. She was prepped by Pfizer’s in-house counsel before the hearing, rehearing the scripted answers over and over. Her job was to give non-answers with just enough credibility to satisfy the MPs and keep them from calling Bourla, again.
Yeah I noticed that but didn't comment on it. I don't think that part of the dodge was intentional; I think she's probably just scientifically illiterate.
It is difficult to differentiate incompetence from malfeasance. They look an awful lot alike. I do think she tried very hard to not answer the question.
You are 100% correct; this is an exhausting and demoralizing subject but I agree with Mr. Creed; abandoning hope is premature.
“In every battle there comes a time when both sides consider themselves beaten. Then he who continues the attack wins.” ― Ulysses S. Grant