It’s my understanding that many people believe the health dangers of microplastics exposure to be over-hyped, but, in due time, the fallout will become undeniable in much the same way that doctors once recommended cigarettes only to find out many years later that they cause cancer and emphysema and other such undesirable conditions.
There is a reasonable suspicion that the surge in main media focus on plastics has to do with covidiana, the shots and what’s been aerially deposited. Confusion is created, and “justification”. If plastic materials are already ubiquitous, this newer proliferation can be made to seem less concerning. Further, it can discourage looking into differentiation, as to what has changed of late under covidiana – it’s all over, so why bother. If anaphylactic nut allergies relate to use of peanut oils for a time in vaxxes, ditto I think in Japan e.g. re gelatin, why not switch to the already breathed in and what’s replete in blood and ocean? Find out more about what has been found encapsulated in blood. A quick quote pulled off a quick websearch on sci lit with which there’s scant useful overlap in main media: “Synthetic polymers serve as a promising vaccine adjuvant materials because of their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and low cost.”…..Get the picture?
Wheat Grass and Spirulina are two natural products that help the body get rid of heavy metals. During our daughter's leukemia treatment Dr. Wheatgrass.com consulted with me and told us to start doing wheatgrass, which we did and the result was my daughter did not need a blood transfusion for five months. This was an incredible amount of time without a transfusion and the only thing that changed were those two items; wheatgrass and Spirulina powder. My husband and I do our green drinks every day. They make us feel good. Due to plastics, heavy metals and all sorts of other toxins we are taking into our bodies every day, these two green powders are highly nutritious as well as helping the body rid itself of the daily toxic load we take in every day.
Hey Benjamin ✨I’m Arsh and my fairly new substack! Came across your post and thought I’ll drop by. My blog is all about sustainability so anyone who’s curious about the field, the new innovations, scoop, and even the basics for someone new! 🌱 follow along on this journey! I make it fun to #SUSitOut
One more thing, the notorious Camels ad (fun to see tho'). I do not think the cancer/medical causality story as maintained in NA re tobacco is anything like the whole story, and a misleading one at that. (I say this as resolute non-smoker, lung-injured occupationally by intense cigarette smoke as youth as well, so I'm no defender just kind of debunker so as to reconsider some things.) It seems there is inconsistency internationally re tobacco stats and cancer. I think the blame might have come to rest on certain topical fertilizers used, adhering to cured tobacco leaves. Where such was not used, at least cancer incidence should be down historically. But more than that, I came to believe that it could not be peer pressure and habituation - and ads - alone that drove the pro-tobacco madness. I noticed many years ago esp. re certain women, in particular those who suffered from MS, were careful but regular users. The likely erroneous conclusion that intake of tobacco itself was contributory to illness, should be turned on its head - they smoked because it relieved some symptoms, was good for them in its way. I also think, after a great deal of research and experience, that the primary extra driver behind tobacco use in modern times has been the stupendous proliferation of electromagnetic pollution from manmade sources, relief from which can be had for some via tobacco. And another thing, again to adduce covidiana, nicotine seems to have acted as inhibitor of some bad stuff present in people’s blood, at least early on, which I think got inside via aerial deposition, setting up as well for aggravation by aerial propagation – of the then coincidentally deployed new wireless infrastructure.
There is a reasonable suspicion that the surge in main media focus on plastics has to do with covidiana, the shots and what’s been aerially deposited. Confusion is created, and “justification”. If plastic materials are already ubiquitous, this newer proliferation can be made to seem less concerning. Further, it can discourage looking into differentiation, as to what has changed of late under covidiana – it’s all over, so why bother. If anaphylactic nut allergies relate to use of peanut oils for a time in vaxxes, ditto I think in Japan e.g. re gelatin, why not switch to the already breathed in and what’s replete in blood and ocean? Find out more about what has been found encapsulated in blood. A quick quote pulled off a quick websearch on sci lit with which there’s scant useful overlap in main media: “Synthetic polymers serve as a promising vaccine adjuvant materials because of their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and low cost.”…..Get the picture?
Wheat Grass and Spirulina are two natural products that help the body get rid of heavy metals. During our daughter's leukemia treatment Dr. Wheatgrass.com consulted with me and told us to start doing wheatgrass, which we did and the result was my daughter did not need a blood transfusion for five months. This was an incredible amount of time without a transfusion and the only thing that changed were those two items; wheatgrass and Spirulina powder. My husband and I do our green drinks every day. They make us feel good. Due to plastics, heavy metals and all sorts of other toxins we are taking into our bodies every day, these two green powders are highly nutritious as well as helping the body rid itself of the daily toxic load we take in every day.
Next we will be indoctrinated with micro-plastic-fantastic viruses.
Hey Benjamin ✨I’m Arsh and my fairly new substack! Came across your post and thought I’ll drop by. My blog is all about sustainability so anyone who’s curious about the field, the new innovations, scoop, and even the basics for someone new! 🌱 follow along on this journey! I make it fun to #SUSitOut
One more thing, the notorious Camels ad (fun to see tho'). I do not think the cancer/medical causality story as maintained in NA re tobacco is anything like the whole story, and a misleading one at that. (I say this as resolute non-smoker, lung-injured occupationally by intense cigarette smoke as youth as well, so I'm no defender just kind of debunker so as to reconsider some things.) It seems there is inconsistency internationally re tobacco stats and cancer. I think the blame might have come to rest on certain topical fertilizers used, adhering to cured tobacco leaves. Where such was not used, at least cancer incidence should be down historically. But more than that, I came to believe that it could not be peer pressure and habituation - and ads - alone that drove the pro-tobacco madness. I noticed many years ago esp. re certain women, in particular those who suffered from MS, were careful but regular users. The likely erroneous conclusion that intake of tobacco itself was contributory to illness, should be turned on its head - they smoked because it relieved some symptoms, was good for them in its way. I also think, after a great deal of research and experience, that the primary extra driver behind tobacco use in modern times has been the stupendous proliferation of electromagnetic pollution from manmade sources, relief from which can be had for some via tobacco. And another thing, again to adduce covidiana, nicotine seems to have acted as inhibitor of some bad stuff present in people’s blood, at least early on, which I think got inside via aerial deposition, setting up as well for aggravation by aerial propagation – of the then coincidentally deployed new wireless infrastructure.